Military Aviation


Because of the F-22 and F-35 ability to track and engage large numbers of aircraft, large numbers of adversary aircraft are needed to create a realistic scenario for training the pilots

As reported by Seapower Magazine, Jeffrey Parker, a former U.S. Air Force (USAF) fighter pilot and CEO of Airborne Tactical Advantage Company (ATAC) told that the F-35 is easily able to counter the adversary services aircraft thrown at it in numbers. For this reason the adversary services industry is struggling to come up with a realistic threat aircraft to challenge fifth-generation fighters.

Nothing gets close to these things [the F-35s],” said Jeffrey Parker. “I’ve flown against the [Marine] F-35Bs down at [Marine Corps Air Station] Beaufort [S.C.] It’s an impressive airplane. Even in the hands of students, it’s a very capable fighter.”

Moreover he added that the U.S. Navy, USAF and U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) need “increased adversary services aircraft” to reduce the airframe fatigue of their front-line fighters and their limited flight hours in the adversary role.

This print is available in multiple sizes from – CLICK HERE TO GET YOURS .F-16C Fighting Falcon 57th Wing, 64th Aggressor Squadron, WA/86-0280 – Nellis AFB, NV – 2012 – Profile Print by

In particular, as explained by Parker, the U.S. Navy “has a shortage of readiness training, so they’re reaching out to industry to try to solve that problem. They’re using too much ‘gray air’ [warfighting aircraft].” Actually an adversary service aircraft that flies 250 hours a year would be able to free an F/A-18 Super Hornet for fleet use for a year. According to Seapower Magazine that means for instance that ten ATAC aircraft in use for 250 hours each can extend the lives of 10 Super Hornets per year.

Currently the U.S. Navy has three squadrons tasked to simulate adversary aircraft: the units are equipped with F-5 or F/A-18 fighters, while the service Topgun school uses both F/A-18s and F-16s. The USMC has one “red air” squadron of F-5s and the USAF two aggressor squadrons of F-16.

Contractor-companies like ATAC supplement adversary service by means of foreign-built fighter aircraft such as the supersonic F-21 Kfir and slower Hawker Hunter.

“The aircraft shortages in training are made worse by the F-35 fifth-generation aircraft, which you need a lot of ‘bad guys’ for,” Parker said.

For this reason more fourth-generation fighters would be needed to meet the increasing demand for adversary services, but Parker said that “not enough fourth-gen aircraft in the world are available to industry. Nobody can provide it all, nor can all of us [the adversary companies] provide it together, at least in the next five years or so.”

According to the U.S. Navy the perfect aircraft to satisfy this requirement would a fourth-generation fighter like an F-16 or a Su-27 featuring an upgraded radar.

“There’s only one category of radar [that can meet specifications] — an AESA [electronically scanned array radar],” explained Parker. Moreover he added that “By going to the fourth-generation level, the Navy is acknowledging that these programs are going to be around and integrated at the highest levels, because now they have radar; pulling 9 gs [nine times the force of gravity] at the merge; [and] helmet off-boresight capability.”

This print is available in multiple sizes from – CLICK HERE TO GET YOURS. F-16C Fighting Falcon 57th Wing, 64th Aggressor Squadron, WA/83-159 – Nellis AFB, NV – 2016

However Parker said that for cost reasons single-engine jets are needed, rather than two-engine aircraft.

Nevertheless providing the number of adversary aircraft needed to challenge the F-22 and F-35 is impossible: in fact because of the Raptor and Lightning II ability to track and engage large numbers of aircraft, large numbers of adversary aircraft are needed to create a realistic scenario for training the pilots.

A claim confirmed by Parker himself who stated “The Raptor is such an uneven fight, that if you send out two Raptors against anything else, there’s no challenge, no work for the pilots to do. For a ‘two-ship’ they want 12 bandits.”

Photo credit: Master Sgt. Shane A. Cuomo and Senior Airman James Hensley / U.S. Air Force; U.S. Navy

Source: Seapower Magazine

Artwork courtesy of

Dario Leone

Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer. He is the Founder and Editor of “The Aviation Geek Club” one of the world’s most read military aviation blogs. His writing has appeared in The National Interest and other news media. He has reported from Europe and flown Super Puma and Cougar helicopters with the Swiss Air Force.

Recent Posts

Naval Aviator explains why the F-35 and its incredible capabilities would have made Top Gun: Maverick boring

The F-35 The 5th generation F-35 Lightning II integrates advanced stealth technology into a highly… Read More

7 hours ago

The “Seahorse:” the P-51D Carrier Testing and why the Mustang was found unsuited for service aboard US Navy flat tops

A modern aircraft carrier By the 1920s, the quest for a modern aircraft carrier was… Read More

7 hours ago

Starting the engine on an F-16 Viper is different from most other jet aircraft. Here’s why.

The F-16 The combat-proven F-16 has proven itself as the world’s most capable 4th generation multi-role fighter,… Read More

1 day ago

USMC A-4 pilot recalls when a USAF F-15 pilot refused to fly a “not all aspect Sidewinder” mock air engagement against his Skyhawk

The Douglas A-4 Skyhawk Douglas built 2,960 A-4 Skyhawk aircraft between 1954 and 1979. Built small to… Read More

2 days ago

Here’s how two little Dents on the SR-71 Nose prevented Surface-to-air Missiles from Scoring any Hit on the Blackbird

The SR-71 Blackbird In the 1960’s, the US Air Force (USAF) developed the SR-71 Blackbird, a… Read More

2 days ago