Spitfire Vs P-51 Mustang: which was the better Merlin-engined fighter?

Spitfire Vs P-51 Mustang: which was the better Merlin-engined fighter?

By Dario Leone
Jun 13 2021
Share this article

Both the Spitfire and the P-51 Mustang, two of the best fighters of World War II, were powered by the iconic Merlin engine. Which was better?

The famous British Rolls-Royce Merlin engine powered the Spitfire and Hurricane fighters during the Battle of Britain in 1940. In September 1940 Packard agreed to build the Merlin engine for both the American and the British governments, and adapted it for American mass-production methods.

The first two Packard-built Merlins to be completed were demonstrated on test stands at a special ceremony at the Packard plant in Detroit on Aug. 2, 1941. Full production began in 1942. In total 55,511 Merlins were produced in the US for the Army Air Forces (54,714 by Packard and an additional 797 by Continental).

The Army Air Forces used the V-1650 (as the US version of the Merlin was designated) almost exclusively in the famed P-51 Mustang, for it provided greatly improved high-altitude performance over the Allison V-1710 engine used in earlier series of that airplane.

Hence, both the Spitfire and the P-51 Mustang, two of the best fighters of World War II, were powered by the iconic Merlin.

So, which was better between the Spitfire and Mustang?

‘The Spitfire was designed in 1936 and was so groundbreaking it was continually developed throughout WW2,’ explains David Perry, who served in the Royal Navy, on Quora.

P-51C print
This print is available in multiple sizes from AircraftProfilePrints.com – CLICK HERE TO GET  YOURS. P-51C-10 Flown by Tuskagee Airmen Col. Charles E. McGee, 302nd FS, 332nd FG, Italy

‘From its inception to its retirement it was simply the best at what it did, which is climb fast, so fast that it would best a P-51 to 30000 by several minutes! Once there, it could out dive, out roll and out maneuver a P-51 whilst shooting it full of holes with a cannon shell that made the 50cal look like a pea shooter. ‘After all of that, it doesn’t seem that the P-51 has anywhere to go!

‘You’d be wrong. If I was in a Spitfire that wasn’t a PR version over Berlin, I wouldn’t be getting home.

‘The P-51 was introduced in 1941 but deemed a failure and only the marriage of the Merlin to the airframe changed its fortunes.

‘The P-51 had the range needed to be the war’s best escort fighter. The Spitfire was a performance aircraft with very little range. A defensive concept. The P-51 took the fight to the enemy.

‘The Spitfire wing was mercurial but worked against the Spitfire when needing range. The P-51 laminar wing was much better for this. Logistically the P-51 turned up in their hundreds and hunted down the remnants of the Luftwaffe.’

Perry concludes;

‘The two were chalk and cheese and designed for different purposes. The Spitfire performed better but the P-51 could go where the Spitfire could only dream.’

Spitfire Mk IXs

Photo credit: Alan Wilson from Stilton, Peterborough, Cambs, UK and Ronnie Macdonald from Chelmsford, United Kingdom via Wikipedia


Share this article

Dario Leone

Dario Leone

Dario Leone is an aviation, defense and military writer. He is the Founder and Editor of “The Aviation Geek Club” one of the world’s most read military aviation blogs. His writing has appeared in The National Interest and other news media. He has reported from Europe and flown Super Puma and Cougar helicopters with the Swiss Air Force.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Share this article


Share this article
Share this article

Always up to date! News and offers delivered directly to you!

Get the best aviation news, stories and features from The Aviation Geek Club in our newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.



    Share this article
    Back to top